Comment on this article
You must be logged in to the O'Reilly Network to post a talkback.

Showing messages 1 through 11 of 11.

• Immediate e-mail confirmation upon submission?
  2003-03-28 08:55:11  anonymous2 [Reply | View]
  
  
  I submitted my entry, and was hoping for some more obvious indication that you had indeed actually received it - some sort of confirmation number or an immediate e-mail confirming the submission. Something to keep in mind for the next round. (Probably too late to do anything about it this round.)

• Uh... Canadian Residents?
  2003-03-19 09:52:44  anonymous2 [Reply | View]
  
  
  Surely it mustn't be too hard to include Canadian residents as a start (baby steps!) Derrick, I realise this may be a bit of a hassle but I commend you on your efforts here at including residents from other countries; not only could I then enter the contest but I think it would be really worthwhile to be as inclusive as possible, even if for the principle alone. Mind you, you may get a number of stellar entries from non-US residents so in future contests international inclusion won't be justified on principle alone!

• anonymous replies (and US only limitation)
  2003-03-16 14:47:59  anonymous2 [Reply | View]
  
  
  I don't have an account here, and I think that means that I can't reply to other people's comments. I think that's kinda stoopid for a message board.
  
  Anyways, I wanted to voice my annoyance for the US residents only rule. I would also like to know what legal issue is the problem. Like someone said, the Apple Design Awards (a very similar contest) is open to entries from a ton of different countries.
  
  If Apple can deal with the legal issues why can't O'Reilly? Can you not at least tell us what the problem is? 'Some random unspoken legal issue' is not very convincing.
• anonymous replies - now possible
  2003-03-28 09:06:54  sarahkim [Reply | View]
  
  
  Hello,
  
  Anonymous users can now reply to other posts.
  
  Sarah
  O'Reilly Network

• The Watson Effect
  2003-03-13 07:01:41  anonymous2 [Reply | View]
  
  
  It's really too bad that a contest of this sort is necessary. It *is* necessary, that's clear, given the way Apple has treated other small-scale innovation successes. Watson is the prime example of this. All Apple had to do to create a spontaneous, permanent version of this contest, was to treat Watson's developers with dignity (offer to buy the IP, hire the developers) and then draw the most attention possible to the partnership.
• The Watson Effect -- Everyone Read This Before Proceeding
  2003-03-13 08:48:57  Derrick Story [Reply | View]
  
  
  I know what you're driving at here, and I see points on both sides of the issue.
  
  First I have to say though, that Watson is kicking Sherlock's butt at the moment. So I think we need another example of Apple's tendency to incorporate what it wants into its OS package while "destroying" the original product.
  
  Second, we here at O'Reilly try to support developers best we can. That is our passion. Sometimes that support includes hooking programmers up with entities that can help them. In the case of the "Mac OS X Innovators" contest, we're working with Apple Developer Connection (ADC).
  
  The point that I'd like to make here, is that the ADC is the developer's advocate *inside of Apple* and they take their job seriously (and it is not an easy job). It was their idea to offer 3 Premier and 3 Select memberships for the winners of these contests. Then, they even came back on their own and said, "We want to add a hardware credit to the runner up prizes." They want developers to succeed.
  
  In my mind, ADC is serious about finding ways to help developers, and their backing of this contest is just one example. They have also been ardent supporters of Mac DevCenter.
  
  Now, does that mean that Apple won't poach a good idea if they see one? There are no guarantees here. That could happen. All sorts of things could happen. No one should be under the illusion that Apple is your friendly hardware company that always acts in the best interests of every one of its customers. And if you are under that illusion, Wake Up! Apple is just as tough and mean as every other kid in this rough technology neighborhood.
  
  On Mac DevCenter we're pushing forward no matter what happens. We're going to run this contest, we're going to improve the software directory, and we're going to provide a place for developers to write about the cool things they've discovered while working on Mac OS X.
  
  And in the end, there will be a lot more good than bad happening in this arena.

• US residents only
  2003-03-12 12:35:30  anonymous2 [Reply | View]
  
  
  I'm also quite disappointed about the exclusion of non US developers. Seems to distort competition a bit...
  
  I'd really be interessted which legal issues prevent opening this contest to international developers. Especially because Apple's Design Awards are open to everyone.

• not only that
  2003-03-12 08:15:34  anonymous2 [Reply | View]
  
  
  But it is not open to residents of Alaska, Hawaii or Florida. Florida must have some weird contest law or something.
  
  

• US residents only
  2003-03-11 23:06:07  kapper [Reply | View]
  
  
  Sorry to see that the competition is closed for any one, but us residents. Perhaps the competition should be relabled to "Mac OS X US Innovators"..... =(
• US residents only -- A Reply
  2003-03-12 10:19:31  Derrick Story [Reply | View]
  
  
  I understand your disappointment, believe me I do. But I'd like you to know that this isn't some sort of American xenophobic action. There are more legal tripwires in a contest like this than there are strings on a harp.
  
  We pushed the limits as far as we could, and the result is the contest you see explained on this site, which if you read the rules, has very few restrictions (and that's on purpose).
  
  (Have you considered a nice sabbatical in beautiful Northern California?)
  
  We'll continue to see how far we can push the limits on future events without risking legal entanglements...
• US residents only -- A Reply
  2003-12-16 14:34:49  anonymous2 [Reply | View]
  
  
  But I'd like you to know that this isn't some sort of American xenophobic action.